The Hitvada Business Bureau | June 29-06-2022 The MMDR Act has certain provisions which are not conducive to mining and the nation’s economy at large. As a result, a drastic fall is being witnessed in mining output, and also a significant drop in employment in the mining sector. While the aims were sound and noble, the lacunae that crept into the acts and laws have negated several aspects which are the very foundation of nobility that the sector could have stood on, said Shivkumar Rao, President, Vidarbha Economic Development Council.
VED members, Chairman of the VED Mining committee, B K Shukla and Committee senior member Arun Deoras, highlighted a few of the salient features that stand out as problems faced by the mining sector. Obviating these obstacles will be helpful in mining, making the auction process more dynamic and will create a win-win situation for the Govt. and miners, they felt. According to them, “mineable mineral reserves” vis-à-vis “estimated mineral resource” are creating problems. The expression “mineable mineral reserve” means the economically mineable part of an “estimated mineral resource” of an area.
However, an amount equal to 0.50% of the “sale value of the estimated mineral resource” is required to be paid as auction premium as upfront payment, reserve price for bidding, performance security, net worth requirement to determine the eligibility for participation in the auction (which varies from 0.5% to 2%) and registration charges for mining lease agreement.
When extraction of a mineral is possible only up to the “mineable mineral reserve”, certainly it is unfair and does not make sense to compel bidders to pay charges / processing fee based on sale value of the entire ‘estimated quantity of mineral resources,” they pointed out.
They suggested that taxes, charges, processing fee, security deposit should be levied for mineable resources of minerals. Under section 26 of MMDRAct-2015, both the Central Government and State Government are authorised to exercise powers conferred under MMDR Act-2015. It is suggested this section should also contain a time-limit for disposal or completion of the said subject matter.
Apart from this, the penalty prescribed in section 21 of the Act is too harsh when compared to the severity and gravity of the offence of the same quantum of punishment mentioned in other criminal laws.
The online bids received for the coal mines will be opened on Tuesday (June 28). The Coal Ministry on Monday said it has received 38 bids under three tranches of commercial coal mine auctions. The last date for submitting online and offline technical bids ended on June 27 and the online bids received as part of the auction will be opened from Tuesday.
“The Fifth Tranche, Second Attempt of Fourth Tranche and Second Attempt of Third Tranche of commercial coal mine auctions were launched by the Nominated Authority, Ministry of Coal on March 30, 2022,” Coal Ministry said in a statement.
Under the Fifth tranche of auctions, a total of 28 offline bids were received against 15 coal mines, where 2 or more bids have been received for eight coal mines, while under the second attempt of the Third tranche, a total of nine coal mines were put up for auctions and six bids have been received against six coal mines.
In the second attempt of the Fourth Tranche (auction), a total of 4 coal mines were put up for sale and four bids have been received against 3 coal mines, the ministry said.
The Centre launched the actions for commercial coal mining in June 2020 under the CMSP Act and the MMDR Act. Under the commercial coal mining auction process, around 42 coal mines have been successfully auctioned so far with a total cumulative PRC (peak rate capacity) of 86.404 million tonnes per annum (MTPA).
The ministry’s view is that a coal mine auction for the sale of coal would drive competition and adopt best practices in mining as well as environment management. Auction of coal mines in a transparent manner is expected to encourage transparent pricing of coal, based on market forces.
The demand for coal is higher than the current level of domestic supply of coal in the country. The gap between demand and domestic supply of coal cannot be bridged completely as there is insufficient availability and reserve of prime coking coal.
Raipur, Jun 26 (PTI) After battling the scorching heat of the summer months while protesting against the clearances to coal mines projects in Hasdeo Arand region since March this year, villagers in Chhattisgarh’s Surguja district are now prepared to get drenched in the monsoon rains during their ongoing agitation.
The protesters said nothing can dampen their morale as they are fighting for their land where they have been living for generations and they will not give up the demonstration until their demands are met.
The protest at Hariharpur village, located around 60 km away from Ambikapur (headquarter of Surguja district), against three coal mine projects entered 111th day on Sunday.
Though the state government has halted all the proceedings regarding three upcoming coal mine projects allotted to the Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited (RRVUNL) in the area, the protesters are sticking to their demand of cancellation of the projects.
The state government had granted permission for non-forestry use of 841.538 hectares of forest land for the Parsa mine (Surguja and Surajpur districts) and 1,136.328 hectares for PEKKB phase-II mine (Surguja) after Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot met his Chhattisgarh counterpart Bhupesh Baghel here in March this year seeking to clear hurdles in the development of the coal blocks allotted to the former’s state.
Another coal block – Kente extension allotted to RRVUNL in Hasdeo Arand region is pending for public hearing.
In October last year, villagers from the region had marched from Surguja to capital Raipur, covering over 300 kms on foot, to register a protest against the proposed coal mines.
When they got no relief, residents of projects-affected villages namely Salhi, Fatehpur, Hariharpur and Ghatbarra, set up a tent in Hariharpur and launched an indefinite protest.
The village has become the epicentre of the protest where protestors bring raw ration from their respective homes and cook and eat together.
“We have been living for generations and conserving the forests. Our life is dependent on it. We just want the government not to destroy it for the sake of coal,” said Ramlal Kariyam, a resident of Salhi village.
Kariyam, who is part of Hasdeo Arand Bachao Sangharsh Samiti – a group of local villagers, has nine members, including his three children, in the family and all of them attend the protest on alternate basis.
Be it summer or monsoon, we will not leave the protest site unless our demands are met, he added.
Sarpanch (village head) of Ghatbarra village panchayat Jainandan Porte echoed the same sentiments and asked why was the government playing with the environment and lives of forest dwellers.
“The government has put on hold the work of mines but it seems that it is just an attempt to silence the protest. We want cancellation of the clearances,” he added.
According to the protesters, the clearances granted to PEKB phase-II and Parsa mines were based on fake gram sabha consent documents.
Hasdeo-Arand coalfield, spread over 1,878 sq km area in Korba, Surguja and Surajpur districts in northern part of the state, is located about 300 km from Raipur. The region is called as ‘lungs of Chhattsigarh’ for its rich sal forest.
“The gram sabhas of the affected villages have already opposed these mining projects and any kind of nod to them is violation of the provisions of the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, the PESA Act 1996, the Forest Rights Recognition Act 2006 and the Land Acquisition Act 2013, said Alok Shukla, an activist who has been at the forefront of agitation.
Last year, the biodiversity study conducted by Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (ICFRE) along with the Wildlife Institute of India, in Hasdeo Arand Coalfield, concluded that coalfields may not be recommended for mining keeping in view of conserving the dense forest which is also home to elephants, he said.
The region is also a catchment area of Hasdeo river, a tributary of Mahanadi river, that flows through it and Bango dam, which helps in the irrigation of over three lakh hectares of agriculture land, he said. The agitation will continue till the cancellation of all the coal mining projects, he added.
Currently there are two coal mines – Chotia and PEKB phase I, operational in Hasdeo Arand region, he said.
The forest department in April this year launched a tree cutting exercise to pave the way for the start of the Parsa coal mining project, triggering strong opposition from local villagers who forced the authorities to halt their action after 300 trees were axed.
A similar scene was witnessed when tree felling started for PEKB phase II last month.
The row over these mining projects also revealed differences within the ruling Congress after health minister T S Singh Deo, who represents Surguja constituency, came out in support of the protestors.
Even Congress leader Rahul Gandhi during his visit to Cambridge early this month said that he has problems with the decision of approval to mining in Hasdeo Arand.
In the recent past, project proponents have been falling back on a 2017 rule to expand existing coal mines incrementally without consulting local communities.
New Delhi: In a worrying trend that is indicative of the Modi government’s indifference towards local communities affected by industrial development, no public hearings were conducted for as many as six out of the nine coal mining projects that were provided environment clearances for expansion in the first half of 2022. The combined expanded capacity of the six projects is 200% higher than that of the three projects for which public hearings were conducted.
The six projects which were cleared without public hearings account for a capacity addition of 10.70 million tons per annum (MTPA) to the country’s coal mining sector, shows an analysis of data contained on the website of the Union Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change (MoEF&CC). On the other hand, the total expansion in capacity of coal mining projects for which public hearings were conducted is 5.35 MTPA.
“The very concept of awarding prior Environmental Clearances without conducting public hearings is dubious enough even though it is done by properly following rules. The rules followed to procure clearances in this manner do not take into account special provisions available to local communities in areas which, owing to the preponderance of tribal population in them, have been identified as Schedule 5 under the Constitution of India,” said Rebbapragada Ravi of mines, minerals and PEOPLE (mm&P), an alliance of individuals and communities affected by mining.
Coal-mining industries are bypassing the process of public hearings by resorting to a rule introduced by the Modi government in September 2017. The rule – introduced through the MoEF&CC in the form of an office memorandum – allows for an incremental increase in the capacity of coal mining projects, up to a maximum limit of 40%, without necessarily having to conduct public hearings.
In the first six months of 2022, the MoEF&CC provided Environmental Clearance to seven new coal mining projects with a combined capacity of 55.81 MTPA. The Siarmal Opencast Coal Mining Project in Sundergarh district of Odisha – undertaken by the public sector Mahanadi Coalfields Limited – accounts for whopping capacity addition of 50 MTPA. If this large project is discounted from the list of new coal blocks that have been provided environmental clearance for mining, the proportion of capacity addition in terms of expanding existing projects is nearly double that of new projects. Total capacity addition to the country’s coal sector in terms of expansion of existing mines has already touched the figure of 11.35 MTPA so far this year.
As per a study released recently by the New Delhi-headquartered Legal Initiative for Forests & Environment (LIFE), in the past three years spanning the period between 2019 and 2022 at least 18 coal mining expansion projects were cleared without public participation. These include six projects in 2019, five projects in 2020 and seven projects in 2021. These 18 projects accounted for total capacity addition of 39.834 MTPA to the coal sector during 2019-21.
“This issue is of great concern as during 2021, almost 50% of Capacity increase of Expansion projects coming for EC under the provision of clause 7(ii) of EIA Notification, 2006, has been granted EC without any sort of public participation,” states the LIFE report.
The report further highlights that between the years 2019 and 2021, the MoEF&CC provided Environmental Clearances to as many as 38 coal mining projects. These include 11 projects (five new, six expansion) in the year 2019 while 12 projects (three new, nine expansion) were provided Environmental Clearances in 2020. In the year 2021, the ministry provided Environmental Clearances to 16 coal mining projects (four new, 12 expansion).
However, by the first half of 2022, the ministry has already provided 16 Environmental Clearances out of which seven are for new projects while nine are for expansion of already existing projects. Given the pace at which coal blocks are being opened up for mining in gross disregard for climate change and the negative environmental impacts thereof, a section of experts has already begun arguing for totally moving away from fossil-fuel-based energy sources.
“Any new investment in coal mining is not only destroying our biodiversity, ecosystems, forests and livelihoods of forest dwellers but is also adding to stranded assets in the sector in a manner akin to that which has happened in the power generation sector over the past two decades. We already have enough coal mining capacity which is either operational, under development or has already been granted Environmental Clearances. Future growth in energy demand will and should be fulfilled by renewable energy sources. There is no need for giving new clearances to ecologically destructive projects like coal mining,” said Sunil Dahiya of the independent research organization Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air.
However, coal-based energy sources continue to account for nearly 50.7% of the total installed power generation capacity of the country while the capacity of installed renewable energy sources lags behind at less than 40%. In times of extraordinary increase in demand for electricity consumption, like the one witnessed between March and June this year when prices of imported coal simultaneously sky-rocketed, the government had to naturally fall back on increasing production and transportation of domestic coal. Environmental Clearances for all new seven new coal mining projects were also provided during this period, that is, between March and June.
Nevertheless, barring local communities from having their say vis-à-vis large coal mining projects is a practice that has been followed by governments cutting across party lines and ideologies. The practice, apparently perceived as beneficial for the corporate sector, was put in place by the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government in December 2012 when, the Union Ministry of Environment & Forests, as it was called under the UPA government, exempted public hearings for coal mining projects seeking to expand 25% of the production capacity. This policy which was also issued through an Office Memorandum permitted only a “one-time expansion” with a ceiling of 2 MTPA if the extracted coal was to be transported by road and a ceiling of 5 MTPA if it was to be transported by the railway network. Just ahead of the general elections of 2014, the UPA government extended the provision of exemption from the public hearings for one-time expansion of coal mines with a capacity of up to 8 MTPA to 50% or 1 MTPA, whichever was higher. The extension was provided through an Office Memorandum that was issued in January 2014 by the environment ministry.
After BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) was elected to power, the MoEF&CC issued another Office Memorandum on May 30, 2014, extending the provisions of the notification issued in January 2014 to those coal mines as well that had already expanded their production capacity as a one-time measure following the notification of December 2012. The NDA government issued another office memorandum in July 2014 empowering the MoEF&CC’s Expert Appraisal Committee, a panel that conducts appraisals of industries likely to impact the environment, to decide on exempting those coal mining projects, where the capacity exceeded 16 MTPA, from public hearings to a ceiling of up to 5 MTPA. This was applicable in cases where extracted minerals were not to be transported by road.
The practice of easing procurement of Environmental Clearances for mining activities by issuing amendments to the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006 through mere Office Memoranda was flagged by the National Green Tribunal while delivering its verdict in a case in September 2015.
“ … the [EIA] Notification mandates the requirement of “prior Environmental Clearance” without exception. However the entire mandate of prior Environmental Clearance has not only been diluted but completely rendered infructuous or ineffective by issuance of these impugned Office Memoranda. Therefore, the Office Memoranda stated to “guidelines”, are potently destructive of the Notification of 2006,” the tribunal had stated in the judgement issued on 7 July 2015.
Nevertheless, since the issuing of this judgement, the Modi government has not limited exemptions for public hearings to the coal mining sector alone. The exemption has been extended to the mining of other minerals including iron, manganese, bauxite and limestone. On 20 October 2021, the Modi government exempted five-star rated mining firms extracting iron, manganese, bauxite and limestone from public hearings while expanding production capacity by as much as 20 per cent. This exemption, which was again issued through an Office Memorandum, holds “written submissions” from affected communities and individuals as measures adequate enough in so far as public consultations are concerned.
Name of the Project
Capacity of New Projects granted EC (MTPA)
Capacity Increase of Projects granted EC for Expansion (MTPA)
Capacity increase of Projects granted Expansion under Sep 2017 OM (MTPA)
Kathara Opencast Coal Mine
Block Bermo, District Bokaro (Jharkhand)
Central Coalfields Limited
Tehsil Patratu, District Ramgarh (Jharkhand)
Central Coalfields Limited
Jamadoba Underground Coal Mine
Tehsil Jharia, District Dhanbad (Jharkhand)
Tata Steel Limited
Brahampuri Coal Mine Project
Tehsil Parasia, District Chhindwara (Madhya Pradesh)
Birla Corporation Limited
Chhal Opencast coal mining
Tehsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)
The New Indian Express | June 24, 2022 The public hearing was organised by the Odisha State Pollution Control Board (OSPCB) and Sundargarh administration at Ispat high school playground in Koida’s Tensa village.
ROURKELA: The public hearing for environmental clearance against mining expansion proposal of the Steel Authority of India Ltd (SAIL) concluded in Sundargarh’s Koida block on Wednesday amid opposition by an environmental group over soil and river water pollution fears.
The public hearing was organised by the Odisha State Pollution Control Board (OSPCB) and Sundargarh administration at Ispat high school playground in Koida’s Tensa village. The meet, which lasted around five hours, was presided over by Sundargarh ADM RN Sahu. Of the at least 57 representations received during the hearing, most supported the expansion proposal.
However on Tuesday, Lokshakti Abhiyan president and environment activist Prafulla Samantara sent an objection letter to the OSPCB member secretary over the public hearing. Samantara alleged that the environmental impact assessment (EIA) report on mining of 750 million tonne of iron ore over 40 years in Barsuan, Taldihi and Kalta mines of SAIL in Koida was not properly and scientifically prepared. He claimed that the report lacked data and studies on pollution and loss of green cover besides impact on human health, local fauna and flora and the rich bodiversity of nearby Khandadhar waterfall.
As per the report, water will be consumed from Kuradih Nullah and Najkura Nullah which would result in depletion of water level of Karo river and ultimately Brahmani river, Samantara alleged and claimed that no gram sabha approval was taken for diversion of huge forest area in violation of the PESA Act while provisions of the Forest Rights Act were also flouted.
Sources said during the public hearing, a supporter of PESA movement in the tribal-dominated district entered the venue and claimed violation of PESA Act in the proposed expansion. SAIL has proposed expansion of iron ore production from 8.05 million tonne per annum (MTPA) to 16 MTPA along with handling of topsoil/overburden/inter-burden of 3.92 MTPA and sub-grade dumps/tailings of 2 MTPA requiring total excavation of 22 MTPA.
Further, SAIL proposes to install dry processing plants of 7 MTPA and 4 MTPA for Taldihi and Kalta iron mines respectively, expansion of the existing 3.5 MTPA beneficiation plant to 4 MTPA along with adequate loading and siding infrastructure in the amalgamated mine lease area of 2,558.85 hectare (ha) of the 2,564.323 ha at Tantra and Bahamba villages besides Toda reserve forest. SAIL sources claimed that forest clearance for 2,419.871 ha and 138.710 ha of non-forest area of its 2,564.323 ha mining lease area has already been obtained.